74 days to remediate a critical app vulnerability. That's the industry median.
Your scanner is finding vulnerabilities.
Your MTTR says they aren't getting fixed.
Edgescan 2025 found the median MTTR for critical application vulnerabilities is 74.3 days - and 45.4% remain unpatched after 12 months. Detection without remediation is a risk metric, not a closed loop.
Join the waitlistSource: Edgescan, Vulnerability Stats Report 2025.
Detection is solved.
Remediation isn't.
45% of critical vulnerabilities are still unpatched after 12 months.
Edgescan 2025 found that 45.4% of critical application vulnerabilities remain unpatched after 12 months. The issue isn't detection - most teams have scanners. The issue is that findings enter a triage queue and wait for engineering bandwidth.
Edgescan, Vulnerability Stats Report 2025.
78% of breaches exploit known, already-patched vulnerabilities.
IBM X-Force 2024 found that 78% of successful breaches exploited vulnerabilities for which a patch already existed. The security team surfaced the finding. The fix existed. The gap is that no one executed it.
IBM, X-Force Threat Intelligence Index 2024.
AppSec teams are drowning in triage, not analysis.
Snyk's Forrester TEI 2025 found that security teams using automated remediation reclaimed 84,000 developer hours and reduced MTTR by 84% over three years. Manual triage is consuming AppSec capacity that should go to threat modeling and architecture review.
Forrester Research, "TEI of Snyk," 2025.
Close findings,
not just dashboards.
MTTR reduction
- Hyrax executes fixes autonomously - critical findings don't wait for sprint assignment
- Continuous scanning means findings surface at introduction, not weeks later
- Every fix is validated against the test suite before it ships
Known vulnerability backlog
- Hyrax's Improve workflow works through accumulated vulnerability backlogs
- Prioritization by severity ensures critical findings execute first
- Every closed finding is a PR with a full audit trail
AppSec capacity reclaimed
- Hyrax handles the triage-to-fix loop - security team reviews governance rules, not individual findings
- Governance rules self-generate from observed failure modes
- AppSec team focuses on architecture review and threat modeling
How Hyrax closes
the remediation loop.
| Stage | Without Hyrax | With Hyrax |
|---|---|---|
| Detection | Scanner flags finding; goes into dashboard queue | Scanner flags finding; Hyrax begins execution immediately |
| Triage | AppSec engineer reviews severity, assigns to sprint | Hyrax prioritizes by severity; no manual triage |
| Fix | Developer implements fix in sprint cycle | Hyrax executes fix autonomously; test suite validates |
| Review | Developer reviews own fix or peer reviews | Engineer reviews and approves Hyrax's PR |
| Verification | Manual re-scan or QA validation | 13-step verification runs pre-merge |
| Closure | Ticket manually closed; audit trail assembled by hand | Linear ticket closes automatically; PR provides full audit trail |
Common questions
from security teams.
Those are detection platforms - they surface findings. Hyrax is the remediation layer. If your MTTR on critical findings is weeks or months, the scanner output isn't being closed. Hyrax closes it.
Because unpatched findings are your risk exposure. If 45.4% of critical vulnerabilities are still open 12 months after detection, the remediation workflow requires developer bandwidth that isn't available. Hyrax removes that dependency.
Hyrax's multi-agent analysis filters low-confidence findings before execution. High-confidence findings execute autonomously; low-confidence findings are surfaced for human review. The 13-step verification means broken fixes don't ship.
Yes. Every fix produces a PR with complete audit trail: finding type and severity, code diff, test suite results, approver, and merge timestamp. This satisfies change management requirements for PCI-DSS, SOC 2, HIPAA, and SOX.